Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  271 / 409 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 271 / 409 Next Page
Page Background

PULLING TOGETHER

255

TWELVE

V. SCORING POINTS WITH MILITARY BULL

if an instructor decided to make the punishment collective. Collective punishment included

short-and-sharp drill, stand-by-bed and change parades, additional area cleaning and delayed

release from camp on Saturdays or long weekends.

In a similar vein, there were rules—applied with varying degrees of strictness—that were

undeniably based on infusing good personal habits and accountability among the officers

and gentlemen-to-be. This included prompt obedience, situational awareness, punctuality,

taking responsibility, thinking through and seeing beyond the immediate problem, keeping

personal equipment in good repair and inspection-ready, military 4x2 haircut, smart turn-out

and ‘regimental’ locker and bed layout.

Interestingly, it was in this last area that some first intake trainees tended to be competitive

with one another. They would go to elaborate lengths to completely line their personal

lockers—which were medium sized two-door wardrobes—with brown paper. Layouts would

be immaculate, with each fatigue tunic and trouser ironed razor sharp and precisely stacked,

civvies buttoned up on hangers, personal possessions laid out symmetrically and the whole

wardrobe strewn with copious amounts of mothballs. Many also developed a fetish about

shining things: brass shoulder-titles, leather boots, mess tins and water bottles. A seasoned

yellow dust cloth was worth its weight in gold. Given the limited feedback on personal

performance, perhaps the first intake yearned for some creative control over their fates

and the opportunity to demonstrate their earnestness. Probably those who went to extreme

lengths to be squeaky-clean in this area hoped to score Brownie points with the instructors

which would weigh in if they fouled up elsewhere.

If, indeed, it was a chink in the armour of the instructors’ objectivity, it was a trap they

set for themselves. When the trainees first reported, they came from many backgrounds.

Fastidiousness in turnout, personal administration and even personal hygiene were, to say

the least, varied. After setting the right tone initially, the instructors may have been wise

to leave well enough alone, but they kept niggling the cadets on the fine details of these

preoccupations throughout the course. In fact, a practice which made the whole exercise of

caring and instantly accounting for personal issue items a counter-productive ritual among

later batches of trainees, raised its insidious head from among the first intake: acquiring a

spare set of those items required for display during the infamous stand-by-bed parades.

Mess tins and water bottles were chromed, boots were polished to mirror brilliance, the

rubber toecaps of jungle boots were heavily blacked and the jockey cap would be lined with

stiffeners for a creaseless look. The issued sets of these items that were actually used on a

day-to-day basis were dumped into a personal bag and left in the wardrobe and usually not

inspected. Somehow, the instructors overlooked the pointlessness of the exercise at the

time. On the contrary, the practice raised the expectations of the instructors and set off