Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  260 / 409 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 260 / 409 Next Page
Page Background

OFFICER CADET TRAINING

244

ELEVEN

XIX. ANTI-GUERILLA WARFARE

Often thought of interchangeably by the cadets as Jungle Warfare, anti-guerrilla warfare

was very much in fashion with local forces. Shortly after the end of WWII, the Malayan

Communist Party had taken to armed struggle in Malaya. British, Australian and New

Zealand forces and British-commanded local units in peninsular Malaya had engaged

in bloody operations against ‘Communist Terrorists’ (CT) as they were called. But with

the appointment of Lieutenant-General, later Field Marshall Sir Gerald Templer as High

Commissioner and concurrently head of operations in Kuala Lumpur (effectively assuming

the role of ‘supremo’), the CT were defeated in the field and Malaya was given independence

in 1957, denying the communists their main propaganda weapon of anti-colonialism. In

fact, active CT cells continued to conduct sporadic attacks on soft targets till 1975/76.

But, for the SMF, the more compelling interest in anti-guerrilla warfare had arisen from

the experience of 2 SIR in February 1965 when Indonesian guerrillas had killed nine and

wounded five men of 2 SIR in Kota Tinggi. 2 SIR had managed to even the score in March

and CPT Daljeet Singh, 2I/C of ‘A’ Company, SAFTI for the first intake officer cadet course,

had been the hero of the search and destroy mission. Not surprisingly, to most servicemen

in the 1960s, the operational mind set was anti-guerrilla warfare.

Strongly rooted in the war against the CT, anti-guerrilla warfare was mostly close terrain

warfare against pockets of armed insurgents and ideological dissidents, whose objective

was to challenge the current political leadership, increase their ideological support among

the public, bring down the civil administration and take over the country. The theatre of

operations could shift to any opportune target, provided they could withdraw to secure

base camps after each strike. They maintained surreptitious logistics lifelines and used their

sympathisers known as Min Yuen, as couriers. Terror tactics discouraged the population in

outlying areas from co-operating with the authorities. To win a war against guerrillas, the

sympathiser support network had to be destroyed, the hearts and minds of one’s own side

had to be won and the enemy had to be tactically defeated in detail in the field. Because of

the close terrain, the full force of conventional support elements could not be brought to

bear, though aerial reconnaissance, aerial bombardment, helicopter mobility and even limited

artillery support could be integrated into ground operations. But the ground operation was

the critical leg of the anti-guerrilla strategy—to kill the CT and reduce their assault groups

in combat in the jungle terrain of their choice. Government forces had to dominate the area

of operations, knock out base camps, keep the CT off-balance so that they could not plan

deliberate operations, and prove that the Government had the upper hand. Information

was vital and an effective, pervasive Special Branch was a top priority. There was a lot of

psychological warfare involved on both sides.

The training programme for the officer cadet course was, however, based almost entirely on

ground operations at and below company level. It dealt with small unit tactics in movement,