Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  398 / 409 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 398 / 409 Next Page
Page Background

382

War correspondents in Korea in the 50s and in Vietnam in the 60s know that armies vary in

the discipline, grit and stamina of its soldiers and the quality of their officers. For example,

the Vietcong have a healthier respect for some than for others of the soldiers on the

American side. And, they do not flee with the same alacrity when pursued by some of the

Asian contingents as when pursued by the South Koreans.

Recently, the Institute of Strategic Studies in London sent me a book about the defence

and security of Southern Asia. In the appendix was set out the strength in numbers and the

equipment of the various armed forces of Asia. Some have armies that run into millions of

regulars and militia. Some have jets, tanks and naval ships. But, there was one component

which was missing. And without this data, it was impossible to compare the capacity of these

various armed forces. And the data was: What is the conversion rate between the various

armed forces?

In other words, how many Koreans and Formosans in the last war equalled one Japanese

soldier. Or, to bring the example more up to date, how many South Vietnamese soldiers

equal one Vietminh soldier from the north, or vice-versa?

Those of you who remember the years of confrontation can amuse yourself with this

exercise in mental arithmetic: How many of the parachutists trained in Indonesia dropped

down over Labis in 1964 equalled one Australian or one New Zealander? For it was they who

eventually helped to round them up.

Upon your performance in the years ahead, people will assess if one Singaporean equals

one Gurkha as foot soldiers. But, that is not good enough, for, unlike the British officered

Gurkhas, we must forge our own officer cadre. As we go up the scale in sophisticated

weaponry, the Singaporeans must match themselves against the best in the world. For only

then will our survival rate be high and secure.

Remember, if knowledgeable people like military attachés in foreign embassies trained to

observe and report on these matters, regard us an unequal in the discipline or perseverance

and, under adverse conditions to be wanting in courage, or that we lack in intelligence to

develop the skills which can come only after intense application to sophisticated weapons,

then it will not be long before others pick up this contempt for our capacity to stand up for

ourselves. This is one of the surest ways to invite an attack to subjugate us and turn us into

economic serfs, or worker ants, for the welfare and well-being of others.

We in Singapore have established our reputation as a resourceful and ingenious community

of merchants, manufacturers, workers and technicians. We have ample time up till the middle

’70s for you and those who will follow you in SAFTI to establish a reputation of us as a

hardy and well organised people. We must transform a rootless society of migrant stock into

a closely knit community, determined to dig our toes in into our own corner of Asia.

SPEECH BY PRIME MINISTER MR. LEE KUAN YEW