Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  178 / 409 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 178 / 409 Next Page
Page Background

SECTION TRAINING

162

NINE

Each trainee was responsible for a rifle (the serial number was listed against his name in

the armskote book), as well as the bayonet, which, together with the magazines drawn for

the day and the bipod which was then a standard issue with each rifle, had to be returned

to the armskote before the trainee could book out of camp, or at the end of the training

day.

1

It was a perpetual running battle between the procrastinator and the duty armskote

man. The chromed barrel of the M16 was easy enough to clean, though by the same token,

it was easy for the instructors to spot either pitting or ‘fornicating elephants inside’ except

that they used a more military adjective. The rifle came with a cleaning rod, not the pull-

through used for the SLR. The cleaning rod consisted of several detachable sections, the

ends of which were screwed into one another, the top piece having a slot for the flannelette

and an alternative one with a cylindrical wire brush like a miniature bottle brush. The joints

were not robust enough to withstand much wear and tear and frequently gave way. Nobody

remembers how it came about, but soon, some trainees began displaying a sturdy brass one-

piece cleaning rod which did the job and was worth the bother of packing in the backpack

on overnight field training, even though it tended to stick out awkwardly because it was a

little longer than the barrel of the rifle. Just about everybody else got into the act soon after

that so some enterprising metal worker in Sungei Road (where nearly any kind of military

knick-knack could be bought from the ‘Thieves Market’) must have made a tidy pile for his

initiative. In due course, a new 2-piece model of the cleaning rod evolved.

It was not only trainees who were excited by their new toys, but the officers and NCOs as

well, because the M16 was frequently seen on television in the hands of American GIs in

the news coverage of Vietnam and had gained universal admiration. Nearly everyone knew

the story of Eugene Stoner who had developed the weapon for Colt and the fact that he was

now developing another weapon under the Stoner brand name.

2

After a second zeroing exercise (the first being with the SLR during basic training), range

practices were to continue well into section training despite the intensive range lessons in

the basic phase. This was initially to satisfy the trainfire package that would fully qualify

the trainees to use the M16 and thereafter, at intervals during the course, to make the new

weapon a natural extension of their combat instincts. Range practice tailed off as live-

firing exercises became the major platform of tactical training. The M16 introduced new

capabilities, particularly with the full automatic mode permitting burst fire, which in turn

allowed for effective instinctive firing from the hip. The M16 also added realism to the

training, together with its other advantages over the SLR because a blank attachment could

be fitted after removing the flash hider. Obviously, with the first intake at SAFTI being the

first to use the M16, the trainfire package itself was experimental and essentially grounded

on the SLR syllabus, which did not fully exploit the capabilities of the new weapon. A major

transition, was in fact in the making. The SLR represented single aimed shots, a WWII

concept, while the M16 represented overwhelming firepower, with high velocity lightweight

rounds and a big increase in the combat load of ammunition. The operating doctrine had yet

to be formulated in the SAF.